Advancing Conference Experiences: Developing UP Open University’s Novel and Open-Source Virtual Tri-conference Platform
Abstract
Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, many academic conferences have moved online or become a mix of in-person and virtual events. However, the problem is that many virtual platforms for these conferences are expensive and have different features. The University of the Philippines Open University (UPOU) has taken a unique approach by creating a new and affordable virtual conference platform. Using Moodle, a free and open-source learning management system (LMS), the University pioneered an in-house-developed conference platform. This study outlines the deployment of the UPOU Virtual Tri-conference Platform (OUTriP) and the improvement of user experience by incorporating features and functionalities related to Look and Feel, Support, and Conference Participation. The participants of the first UPOU Tri-conference (Tri-con) evaluated the OUTriP. Our findings reveal a positive reception of the platform, as indicated by an SUS score of 70.86, interpreted as sound. Most participants offered favorable feedback on the platform's user-friendly nature and effectiveness. The practical implementation of our virtual conference platform holds significant implications, particularly for educational institutions on a budget looking to organize virtual conferences. This platform provides a cost-efficient and adaptable solution, and UPOU's experience showcases the practicality of repurposing Moodle to establish a functional and user-friendly virtual conference platform.
Received Date: January 24, 2024
Revised Date: March 7 , 2024
Accepted Date: April 10, 2024
Click to Access and Download the Article:
References
- Akhademe, A. E., Ikegwu, E. M., & Akhademe, L. E. (2023). Virtual technologies and conferences attendance: Perceptions of YCT academic staff. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 7(7), 9–20. https://doi.org/10.47772/ijriss.2023.70702
- Al-Ajlan, A., & Zedan, H. (2008). Why Moodle. 2008 12th IEEE International Workshop on Future Trends of Distributed Computing Systems (pp. 58–64), Kunming, China. IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/FTDCS.2008.22
- Bangor, A., Kortum, P. T., & Miller, J. (2009). Determining what individual SUS scores mean: Adding an adjective rating scale. Journal of Usability Studies, 4(3), 114–123. https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.5555/2835587.2835589
- Bhargava, S., Negbenebor, N., Sadoughifar, R., Ahmad, S., & Kroumpouzos, G. (2021). Virtual conferences and e-learning in dermatology during COVID-19 pandemic: Results of a web-based, global survey. Clinics in Dermatology, 39(3), 461–466. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clindermatol.2021.06.002
- Brooke, J. (1996). SUS: A "quick and dirty" usability scale. Usability Evaluation In Industry, 207–212. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781498710411-35
- Brooke, J. (2013). SUS: A retrospective. Journal of Usability Studies, 8(2), 29–40. https://doi.org/10.5555/2817912.2817913
- Diakova, N. S., & Popova, O. G. (2020). Moodle options in the process of scientific events preparation and organization. Informatics and Education, (8), 16–24. https://doi.org/10.32517/0234-0453-2020-35-8-16-24
- Kumar, P. (2013). Moodle plugin for game-based learning. Indian Institute of Technology Bombay.
- Medina, L. R., & Shrum, W. (2022). Going virtual: Academic conferences in the age of COVID-19. First Monday. https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v27i4.12571
- Mustafa, A. S., & Ali, N. (2023). The adoption and use of Moodle in online learning: A systematic review. Information Sciences Letters, 12(1), 341–351. https://doi.org/10.18576/isl/120129
- Pugoy, R. A. D. L., Habito, C. D. L., & Figueroa, R. B. (2016). Hybrid online/offline mobile solutions for accessing open educational resources in areas with poor internet connectivity. Asian Association of Open Universities Journal, 11(2), 182–196. https://doi.org/10.1108/aaouj-09-2016-0030
- Veldhuizen, L. J., Slingerland, M., Barredo, L., & Giller, K. E. (2020). Carbon-free conferencing in the age of covid-19. Outlook on Agriculture, 49(4), 321–329. https://doi.org/10.1177/0030727020960492
- Wolff, R. (2022, June 30). The costs of virtual event platforms. Markletic. https://www.markletic.com/blog/virtual-event-platform-costs/
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
